Tag: Katz

  • Still Looking for a Good Book on the Haiti Earthquake

     
    DSC_0046-1

    I seek out books on the Haiti earthquake in the hopes of
    finding one that captures what I experienced and perhaps helps me to understand
    it better. Instead, all of the books seem to describe a different event. Like
    the story of the blind men trying to describe an elephant, one author talks
    about the leg and another about the trunk. Perhaps all I know is the tail.

    I had high hopes for two books that just came out: Jonathon
    Katz’ The Big Truck That Went By: How the World Came to Save Haiti and Left Behind a Disaster
    and Amy Wilentz’ Farewell, Fred Voodoo: A Letter from Haiti. Each book captured
    part of what I experienced, but they each described a world that I didn’t know.


    Jonathon Katz was an AP reporter that had lived in Haiti for
    a couple of years before the earthquake. His account of the actual earthquake
    and the events of that night were the most powerful part of the book. I found
    it to be especially spooky because Carolle and I had lived and been married in
    the house that collapsed under him. I had hoped that his book would show a
    strong understanding of Haiti and how the events unfolded. The best parts of
    the book were his description of the night of the earthquake and then his quest
    to find out the UN’s role in introducing cholera. Unfortunately, most of the
    rest of the book felt superficial—more of a drive-by viewing of the disaster
    response.

     


    Amy Wilentz’ book was the opposite. Whereas Jonathon Katz
    tried to tell a straight forward story of the disaster, Amy’s book seems to be
    more her grappling with the earthquake and its aftermath. The book reads more
    as a collection of thoughts than a coherent story. It is a very personal book
    as she openly wrestles with her feelings towards Haiti and journalism—is she
    helping Haiti by getting people’s stories out or is this just voyeurism? Her
    first book had been on the epic struggle to get rid of Duvalier and of
    Aristide’s rise to power. But Aristides’s presidencies were failures and
    Duvalier is back in Haiti. Perhaps it wasn’t such an epic time after all. Her
    book clearly reflects her personal struggle with the impact that she is having.

    Both books skewer the disaster response provided by the
    international community. The subtitle of Katz’ book nicely sums up his view,
    How the International Community Came to Haiti and Left Behind a Disaster. Amy
    Wilentz wrote “It’s fair to say that one of the biggest issues to rise from the
    earthquake’s dust is whether aid agencies and international development
    organizations can ever be trusted, either by the victim community or by the
    donors who fund them. Are they honest—do they know how to be honest; can they
    be honest and survive?” She goes on to complain that aid agencies are not
    effective at working themselves out of a job. 

    Yes, it was confusing and there were some big mistakes made
    (the construction of the Corail camp out in the middle of nowhere being
    one—providing services in makeshift camps was another). Both lionize Sean Penn
    for running a camp as well as the pros. But if the pros are running camps as
    well as Sean Penn, doesn’t that mean that the “pros” were doing something
    right, too?

    This is where both she and Jonathon Katz got it wrong. The
    earthquake response that I saw was an exhausting slog against incredible
    obstacles and through a bizarre maze. Although some of the early journalists
    seemed to have believed that Port-au-Prince had been completely destroyed, that
    was never true. Half of all the buildings in Port-au-Prince were not
    significantly damaged. Although President Preval’s government seemed to
    disappear in the first days after the earthquake, it soon reasserted
    itself. 

    The biggest complaint against the work that the NGOs did is
    that we did not build a shiny new Haiti from the rubble of the earthquake. Yet
    that was never our mandate. As weak as the Haitian government was, it was still
    the national government. It was the only institution that could have declared
    eminent domain to seize land to create camps, widen streets, or enforce a new
    city wide master plan. Neither the NGOs nor the United Nations had this
    authority. When the government was unwilling to take these steps, no one could.
    But what’s the point in bashing the Preval Government? Its weaknesses were
    quite well known and documented.

    I ran the  earthquake response for the Pan American Development Foundation, one of the larger NGOs, from the
    day after the earthquake until this past January. Of course I made mistakes—we
    were trying to move as fast as we could in a very complex environment and using
    whatever resources we could find. We passed out food and other goods that had
    been collected in the States to help the poor Haitians. I would much rather
    have received cash, but our local partners were happy to receive whatever we
    could give them. I would much rather have purchased local rice rather than
    receiving donations of fortified rice, but the imported rice was free and we
    didn’t have much cash. Our first attempt at home repair in the Jacmel area fell
    flat—we had budgeted too little money and the repairs were too isolated. 

    We also had huge successes. We helped evaluate the safety of
    over 400,000 structures throughout the earthquake impacted area. This gave
    hundreds of thousands of people the confidence to return to their safe house
    and provided a blueprint for the repairs that were needed. We trained hundreds
    of engineers, masons, and contractors in improved construction techniques and
    used them to repair 10,000 houses. We helped neighborhood committees come
    together to determine how they wanted their neighborhood rebuilt.  We helped scores of microentrepreneurs to
    start small businesses.


    In Dr. Farmer’s earthquake book, Haiti After the Earthquake, he
    seemed to believe that his organization was the only one to do a good job. I’ll
    bet a lot of us feel this way. My organization did a great job. It’s too bad
    that all the other organizations couldn’t do as well. Naturally some organizations
    did better than others. Unfortunately, most people who donated, donated
    blindly. They gave to the Red Cross because they always give to the Red Cross,
    even though the Red Cross’ reputation as a slow bureaucracy is documented after
    every disaster. They gave to Wyclef Jean because he is a famous Haitian, not
    because they thought that he had a professional organization behind him. I wish
    that more of the funds had gone to PADF and other organizations that were well
    established in Haiti, but I thank God that people did give.

    Perhaps someday I’ll find a book that tells the story of the
    earthquake as I saw it—the story of a hard struggle to have the greatest
    possible impact as quickly as possible in an incredibly complex situation.

    Our work wasn't perfect, but it was the best that we could possibly do and Haiti is better off for it..